The North American Construction Markets
In North America, residential construction is one of the most intense
users of wood. In addition to softwood framing-lumber, housing absorbs a lot of structural
wooden boards, above all plywood, Waferboard, OSB, I-Joists, and LVL, as well as wood for
siding, decking, hardwood flooring, doors, windows and other architectural millwork. It is
therefore important for the lumber and wooden board industries to closely monitor the
residential construction market. Apart form the direct lumber usage for construction
purposes, new residential buildings trigger a delayed secondary demand for wood, mainly in
the form of furniture and cabinets. In the United States, housing starts peaked in 1999
with 1.64 million new units built. In the following year, new starts were only slightly
lower, at 1.57 million units.
The US economy experienced a slowdown last year. During the second half of 2001 - and
in particular after the terrorist attack on New York in September - a more pronounced
weakening of the construction activity could be observed. It is estimated that
approximately 137,000 housing starts may have been "lost" in the wake of the
attack.
In spite of these unfavorable circumstances, home sales in the United States held up
remarkably well. The decline of housing starts from an average of 1.62 millions (at annual
rates) during the first three quarters of 2001 to an average of 1.57 million in the last
quarter was less severe than has been anticipated by many analysts. In 2001 as a whole,
American home builders still managed to erect 40,000 more housing units - that is a total
of 1.61 million - than in the previous year.
A stimulating monetary and fiscal policy in the United States has been most beneficial
to the economy in general and to the housing market in particular. A series of interest
rate cuts and tax reductions helped to keep consumer confidence high and the housing
market reasonably healthy. Following the September 11 attack on New York, mortgage rates
have moved down by about 15 basis points. Fixed-rate home mortgages can now be obtained at
6.5 percent or lower, and one-year adjustable rate mortgages are available at less than 5
percent.
Residential real estate transactions that are lost in the shortterm are generally
regained down the line. This catch-up phenomenon explains - at least partially - why the
demand for new houses has been much stronger during the fist quarter of this year than it
would have been prior setback. Expressed at an annualised rate, 1.65 million new housing
units have been started during the first three months of 2002. This is an increase of 5.1
percent compared to the previous quarter. The jump in multi-unit starts amounted to almost
20 percent. Parallel to the new housing market, building permits and sales of existing
homes have also progressed nicely.
Prospects for a substantial economic rebound in 2002 and 2003 are good. Nevertheless,
fundamental demographic factors in the USA are pointing to a weaker housing market in the
years to come. The US population is growing very slowly and the average age is rising. The
construction jump during the first quarter of this year, caused by the catch-up demand, is
unlikely to be carried over to the remainder of this year. On an annualised basis, the
average number of starts during the next three quarters of 2002 will be in the vicinity of
1.57 million, representing a decline of 4.8 percent compared to the first quarter. For
2002 as a whole, residential housing starts may be around 1.59 million, down 1.2 percent
from the previous year. For 2003 the number may be still lower at approximately 1.56
million. An additional contributing factor to this predicted decline is the prospect of
rising mortgage rates.
Housing Starts
- 1.64mil
- 1.57mil
- 1.61mil
- 1.59mil
- 1.56mil
The figures above cover only (i) single family housing units and (ii) multifamily
housing units. Not included are (iii) mobile homes, which contributed about ten percent -
or some 160,000 units as of 2001 - to the overall residential housing market. During the
past few years, the multifamily segment experienced noticeable advances. On the other
hand, construction of single-family dwellings declined moderately and mobile home
construction declined significantly by almost 50 percent between 1999 and 2001. Back in
1999, mobile homes still made up over 17 percent of the overall number of housing units
built in that year.
Single Family Homes |
70.8% |
Multifamily Homes |
18.9% |
Mobile Homes |
10.3% |
The Canadian housing market is about one-tenth of the American size. In recent years,
it performed somewhat better than the US market. Starts of new housing units in 1999 stood
at 150,000. It increased to 152,000 in 2000 and 163,000 last year. The strong trend
continued this year. Housing starts surged to a staggering 175,000 units during the first
quarter of 2002 (expressed on an annualized bases). As we expect some slowdown in activity
later this year, starts for this year as a whole may drop to 161,000 units. The same
number is again expected for 2003. Similar to the United States, the Canadian housing
market is driven by low borrowing costs and a hectic activity in the apartment and
townhouse segments. Furthermore, unseasonably warm weather in Central Canada was a boon to
the building industry.
The Canadian housing market is concentrated in just a few provinces. Ontario is leading
with a 45 percent share. The Toronto Metropolitan area alone accounts for over one-quarter
of the country's total market. Ontario is followed by Alberta with an 18 percent share and
Quebec with a 17 percent share.
The strength of the present Canadian housing market is centered in Ontario, where
starts are now close to the peak level of the housing boom of the late 1980s.
Non-residential construction is not using wooden building materials to the same extent
as residential construction. Nevertheless it still is an important contributor to the wood
industry's overall demand. Non-residential construction in the USA reached a relatively
high value of US$ 179.8 billion in 2000 but fell 10.3 percent - to US$ 161.1 billion - in
2001. Poor corporate profits and rising vacancies pulled commercial and industrial
construction lower.
Industrial vacancy rates hit a new record of 10.1 percent, while office vacancy rates
climbed to 11.0 percent - the highest level in four years. Dallas, TX stands out with the
highest vacancy rate at 24.4 percent while Washington, DC has the lowest rate at 4.7
percent. Only construction projects by governments recorded a modest increase last year.
Canadian office vacancy rates are generally lower than in the USA. Nevertheless, they
moved up last year, reaching a national average of 7.3 percent as of year-end. Cities
lying well above this average include Montreal and Vancouver (in excess of 8 percent) and
cities with a particularly tight supply of office space include Ottawa (1.7 percent) and
Winnipeg (5.3 percent).
|